Available in
Free download

Nonprofit business plan template written for funders and boards

The standard eleven chapters, with guidance on what changes: programs instead of products, a funding mix instead of revenue, and the governance section commercial templates leave out. No email required.

  • How to cost programs per person, which is what grant committees compare
  • Laying out a funding mix by source and reliability
  • Writing the governance and impact sections funders score
Also inWordGoogle Docs
524,483downloads

Thirty-one pages, written for the sector: programs, funding mix, governance and impact, with a statement of activities in place of a profit and loss. There is no break-even line and no income tax line, because neither applies.

Capterra rating - Excellent 4.9/5.0
Nonprofit team reviewing their plan together
guarantee
15-Day Money BackGuarantee
4.9Capterra Logo
4.9G2 Logo
Product Hunt - Product of the Day
Same file, different job

Six chapters that mean something else here

The template is the standard eleven chapters. What changes is what belongs in them when there is no owner, no profit and a funder rather than a customer on the other side.

Executive summary

In a commercial plan

What the business sells and what it earns

In yours

The need you exist to meet and who else is meeting it. Funders read this first and decide here whether to keep reading, so the specific need beats the mission statement.

Products and services

In a commercial plan

What customers buy

In yours

Your programs, each with who it serves, how many, and what it costs to run per person. That per-person number is what a grant committee compares you on, and most first drafts do not have it.

Financial plan

In a commercial plan

Revenue, costs, profit

In yours

A funding mix rather than a revenue line: grants, individual giving, events, contracts and any earned income, each with its own reliability. Show the overhead ratio before you are asked for it.

Management and organisation

In a commercial plan

Founders and key staff

In yours

Staff plus the board, and what the board is actually responsible for. Governance is a scored item in most grant applications and it is the section commercial templates have no equivalent of.

Market analysis

In a commercial plan

Market size and competitors

In yours

The population you serve and the other organisations serving it. Framing peers as competitors reads badly to funders, who often fund several of you. Describe the gap you fill instead.

Measurement

In a commercial plan

Usually absent

In yours

Outcomes, not activities. Not how many workshops you ran, but what changed for the people who attended, and how you know. This is the section that decides repeat funding.

The financial plan

Five income sources, and how steady each one is

A commercial plan has a revenue model. You have a mix, and the mix is what gets assessed. Two organisations raising the same amount can look completely different here.

Restricted grants

Predictable, then cliff-edged

Reliable for the term and then gone. They also cannot be spent on the thing that usually needs funding, which is core running costs. Show the end date of each one in the plan rather than a single grant income line.

Unrestricted giving

Variable, most valuable

Individual donors and regular givers. Harder to grow and worth more per dollar than anything else, because it pays for the staff and the rent. Worth its own section on how you intend to build it.

Service contracts

Stable, administratively heavy

Delivering something for a public body or a larger charity. Steady money, often paid in arrears, which is a cash flow problem rather than an income one. Model the payment timing, not just the amount.

Earned income

Slow to start, yours to keep

Selling something related to the mission. Takes a few years to matter and is usually the route to not being grant-dependent. Say honestly where it is in that arc.

Events

Overestimated almost every time

Count the staff hours against the net, not the gross. Plenty of events raise a respectable sum and lose money once the time is priced in, and a funder reading closely will notice before you do.

Put these in the plan as a table with each source, the amount, and the month it starts and ends. A funder can read concentration risk off that in seconds, which is the point.

The two scored sections

Governance and impact, written properly

These are the two sections a commercial template has no equivalent of, and the two most often scored directly in a grant application. Here is what actually goes in each.

The governance section

  • Who is on the board and what they bring

    Name, role outside the organisation, and the specific thing they are there for. Finance, legal, lived experience of the issue, a link to the community you serve. A list of job titles with no stated purpose reads as a board assembled from whoever was available.

  • What the board decides and what staff decide

    Write the dividing line down. Spending thresholds, hiring, program changes. Assessors look for an organisation where one person is not quietly doing all three, and this is where they look.

  • How often it meets, and quorum

    Quarterly is the common minimum. If attendance has been thin, say so and say what you are changing. A plan that admits a governance weakness and has a fix is stronger than one that implies everything is fine.

  • Conflict of interest and safeguarding

    Say that the policies exist, when they were last reviewed, and who reviews them. One short paragraph. Its absence is noticed far more than its presence is rewarded.

The impact section

  • Separate what you did from what changed

    Forty workshops delivered is an activity. Thirty-one of the attendees still in work six months later is an outcome. Report both, clearly labelled, and never let the first stand in for the second.

  • Say how you collected it

    A follow-up call, a form at the door, data from a partner agency. One sentence of method turns a figure into evidence. Numbers with no stated method are the first thing an experienced assessor discounts.

  • Give the denominator

    Eighty percent of respondents is meaningless if four people replied. Write it as a fraction and let the reader judge. It costs you nothing and buys more credibility than the percentage would have.

  • Include what did not work

    One program that underperformed, with what you changed, does more for a funder's confidence than six successes. It tells them you measure honestly, which is the thing they are really trying to establish.

Want more on the sector side? Our guide to writing a nonprofit business plan goes into the parts this template only has room to prompt for.

Reporting to a board every quarter? Upmetrics keeps the numbers current.

Other versions

Not quite the right one?

Same template underneath. What changes is the guidance around it, and which sections do the work.

Or go back to the full business plan template.

FAQ

Plans, funders and boards

Most grant applications of any size ask for one, and so do banks if you ever borrow against a building. Beyond that it is the document that keeps a board and a staff team agreeing on what the organisation is for, which matters more than the grant.
Same eleven chapters, four of them doing a different job. Programs replace products, a funding mix replaces revenue, governance gets a real section rather than a mention, and you add outcome measurement, which commercial plans usually have no equivalent of.
The funding mix by source with start and end dates, your overhead ratio, and the cash position month by month. Restricted and unrestricted funds should be visibly separate, because a healthy total can still hide an inability to pay salaries.
Most funders are comfortable in the fifteen to twenty-five percent range, and the sector has moved away from treating lower as automatically better. A figure under ten percent often means the organisation is underinvesting in its own staff. State yours and explain it rather than hoping nobody asks.
Yes. Who sits on it, what they bring, how often it meets and what it decides as opposed to what staff decide. Governance is a scored item in many grant applications and a thin board section is read as a real risk.
Report what you can actually count and say how you counted it. Attendance is a count, not an outcome, but it is honest. One measured outcome with its method described beats five impressive figures with no source, and funders are practised at spotting the difference.
The plan supports an application, it is not the application. The IRS form asks its own questions. A written plan is useful for answering the narrative parts consistently, and for the board resolution behind them.
Yes, with no email form in front of it. PDF, Word or copy the Google Doc, all from this page.

Still have questions? Contact our team

Upmetrics

Grant deadlines do not move. The budget should not be the hold-up.

Build the funding mix once and let the cash flow and the board report update themselves as figures change.

  • No risk
  • Cancel at any time
  • 15 Day money back guarantee